• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

GreyMatters

Electrical Earthing System Design & Soil Resistivity Testing

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Earthing Services
    • Earthing Design Services
    • Lightning Protection Design
  • Earthing Training Courses
  • XGSLab
    • XGSLab Services
    • XGSLab Online Demo
    • XGSLab Sales
  • Members Academy
Home » Ask the Experts Electrical Earthing Blog » 7 Deadly Sins of Electrical Earthing Part 1

14/05/2015 By Ian Leave a Comment

7 Deadly Sins of Electrical Earthing Part 1

Let’s not beat around the bush … An unplanned release of Electricity can and does kill!

earthing electricity

Power systems are dangerous and proper Electrical Earthing and bonding are necessary to prevent unplanned current passing through personnel, critical equipment and other nearby metallic objects. But be careful of simply bonding everything back to an electrode and considering the job done.

Find out the difference between earthing and bonding here. 

Although Electrical Earthing system design can be a huge subject let’s take a look at some common electrical Earthing/grounding mistakes that can adversely affect your Electrical Earthing design.

The IEC has developed some strict requirements for professional electrical Earthing system design. So, always consult an electrical Earthing professional to help ensure the safety of personnel and the protection of critical equipment at your site.

7 Common Electrical Earthing Design Mistakes

  1. Lustful over-simplification
  2. Gluttony of sand
  3. Greed for land
  4. Slothliness of legacy methods
  5. Wrath of errors
  6. Instrument of Envy
  7. Misplaced Pride

#1 – Lust for the over-simplification

There are times when simplifying a problem makes perfect sense and can be useful.  Usually, this is applicable when the problem is easily understood, low complexity and not prone to errors.  Equally, there are times when simplifying is the worst thing one can do, because an error in the initial simplification can be multiplied many times over as it is progresses through the process until a 50% error at one end can reach many 100’s of % error – Soil structure is one such example.

According to EN 50522-2010, an electrical “Earth” is defined as:

“A conductor or group of conductors in intimate contact with, and providing an electrical contact to earth.”

So by it’s very definition, it’s paramount to get ‘intimate’ with the soil structure of your electrical arthing system design. As this is the very medium in which the energy from a fault or lightning strike will flow on its return journey back to its source.

The first Electrical Earthing Sin is the lust of the over-worked/under resourced Engineer to over-simplify (for convenience) the soil structure by assuming a single layer 100 Ω.m or at best a two-layer soil structure.

Unfortunately, mother-nature does not make things easy for Electrical Earthing Designer. Soils are a product of a natural geological formation process and will vary according to what and how the area was formed using what materials. For example, sediment  deposits, pressurised movements, molten rock, etc.

Each soil material layer will have its own unique electrical signature for electrical earthing. This is measured and quantified by electrical ‘resistivity’.  So knowing how a soil layer will perform when loaded with an electrical fault is a foundational requirement for a safe design. To ‘assume’ an arbitrary value based on Miller Box Soil data or similar can introduce massive errors in the subsequent safety calculations from the outset.

So, always take good soil resistivity testing method. Such as the  Wenner 4-point resistivity measurements using instruments that can inject high signal current/voltage to ensure good accuracy.  Avoid lustful thoughts to over-simplify.


Sin #2 – Gluttony of Sand

On recent sites, I’ve seen backfilling of conductor electrodes at both ends of the spectrum. One using sand, the other using stone (both imported).

What’s the problem?

Electrical Earthing successfully achieves it’s purpose in life through the control of surface potentials.  This is done through the careful geometric arrangement of electrode conductors AND by the quality of the electrical earthing connection (of the man-made bits) achieved with the Earth itself.

The quality of this interface or connection to Earth is largely reliant on the immediate volume of soil which surrounds the conductor(s).  In turn, the connection quality is dependent on the surface contact and the resistivity of this immediate volume. For example, let’s take a look at the jar of stone below,  what’s going to happen if an earth electrode is backfilled using this material?

Ignoring the resistivity of the rock for a moment. The size of rocks (granularity) shown below will be relying on “point-contact” for its interface.  This leads to a really HIGH contact resistance. Which is a POOR choice for a covering backfill for an earth electrode/conductor because of the low contact surface area as a result of the point-contact.

The situation can be improved massively, by introducing a finer material of compatible low resistivity to infill the voids and provide a fully contacted surface area with the conductor(s).

Rock Backfill

WARNING!  When faced with a rock backfill as above do NOT be tempted to use sand or stone dust to infill the voids.  The infill must be sufficiently low in resistivity to improve the connection. Not destroy it.

Unfortunately, due to the abundance (gluttony) of sand as a construction material it’s all to common to see sand used as a backfill material for electrical earthing systems. This does NOT work!

Dry, silica sand has an extremely high resistivity (x10^18 Ωm) so one can almost consider the material an insulator.

This means coating a ‘conductor’ in an insulation covering because it is cheap, plentiful and convenient is not a great idea when the objective is to achieve a ‘conductive’ relationship with the surrounding ground.

Therefore, Sin #2 is the Gluttonous use of sand!

Catch up on the next in the 7 Deadly Sins of Electrical Earthing series:

7 Deadly Sins … of Electrical Earthing … Part 2

7 Deadly Sins … of Electrical Earthing … Part 3

If you would like a Free 20 minute Consultation click on the Live Chat or Contact buttons.

FEATURED IMAGE:  by Mihiru93


Inspired by the THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS OF ELECTRICAL Earthing DESIGN whitepaper published by E&S Grounding Solutions


[wptab name=’About’]

Ian Griffiths SelfieIan Griffiths

Ian is a Principal Consultant at GreyMatters, with 26 years experience solving HV earthing, EMC, and lightning problems for clients worldwide.  When he’s not busy studying problems and designing solutions, you can find him mountain biking, sailing and racing motorbikes in the summer.  In the winter he tends to head off to the mountains chasing the snow with friends and family.  Ian holds a Master’s Degree, and Degrees in both Mechanical and Electrical disciplines, and is one of the top 1% accredited CDEGS consultants and advisor to international utility companies, data-centre and infrastructure developers globally.

[/wptab] [wptab name=’Latest Posts’]

Recent Posts by Ian

50 Shades Freed – Unleashing CDEGS!

50 Shades Darker – CDEGS Myths Busted!

50 Shades of GreyMatters

Real people, real answers in real time – the power of LIVE CHAT for our clients

[/wptab] [end_wptabset]


Filed Under: Electrical Earthing Tagged With: 7 Deadly Sins, bonding, BS7430, CDEGS, Earth mat resistance, earth potential rise, Earthing, Earthing system design, Electrical Earthing, Electromagnetic Field Theory, EN 50522-2010, Finite Element Analysis Software, Grounding, Rise of Earth Potential, safety calculations, soil layer, soil structure, Wenner 4-point resistivity

Electrical Earthing Training – Free Trial

Do you want to understand more about Electrical Earthing System Design – Greymatters Academy is our Earthing Training site take a look or access your free trial here.

Recent Posts:

Ian getting ready

We take a look at soil resistivity and provide practical advice on what is ground soil resistivity, why we measure it and these common mistakes when Soil Resistivity Testing:

Soil Resistivity Testing Methods Wenner 4 Probe Test

Soil Resistivity Testing Methods a popular post. Originally published in 2013 and now updated. A Wenner probe test is a geotechnical investigation method used to determine the electrical resistivity of the soil. Soil resistivity testing can be carried out using different methods. The Wenner 4 Probe test is one of the most common soil resistivity […]

Schlumberger Array

The Schlumberger array is a geotechnical investigation method which determines the electrical resistivity of the soil. This is similar to the Wenner probe test, but it uses multiple current electrodes rather than just two. This allows for a more detailed and accurate measurement of soil resistivity. Soil resistivity testing carried out using different methods, this […]

Driven Rod Method

The driven rod test is a geotechnical investigation method which determines the resistance of soil to the penetration of a rod or other penetrometer.  The Soil resistivity is determined using different Soil Resistivity Testing methods. However the Driven Rod, described below is the last of the three most popular Soil Resistivity Testing methods we use […]

2022 webinar - the highlights

Knowing in today’s world it’s all about time. We’ve summarise hours of technical content into this 20-minute bite-sized session, including the key highlights from the 2022 webinar series. If you missed it, watch the webinar replay here. In this webinar we cover:

About Ian

This post is written by Ian Griffiths, Principal Engineer at GreyMatters, an Earthing & Lightning Consultant of 28 years, one of the top 1% accredited CDEGS and XGSLab consultants and professional advisor to international utility companies, data centre and infrastructure developers.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

GreyMatters Accreditations

GreyMatters Accreditations

Online Earthing Courses

Free Trial Learn More

Free Online Course – Learn Ohms Law in 10 minutes or less!

Learn Ohms Law

Blog Categories

  • Acadamy (2)
  • Anti-Theft (1)
  • CDEGS (6)
  • Earth Testing (6)
  • Earthing Designs (7)
  • Earthing System Design (16)
  • Earthing Systems (5)
  • Electrical Earthing (38)
  • Energy Modelling Software (1)
  • General Post (10)
  • Grounding (1)
  • Lightning (11)
  • Lightning Protection Design (16)
  • Lightning Strike (1)
  • Renewable Energy (2)
  • Soil Resistivity (18)
  • Soil Resistivity Testing (10)
  • Solar (4)
  • XGSLab Updates (3)

Tag Cloud

BS7430 BS EN 50522 CDEGS data centres earth electrode Earthing earthing design earthing protection earthing standards Earthing system design earthing systems earth potential rise earth systems Electrical Earthing System Design Electromagnetic Field Theory electromagnetic interference EMI EN 50522 EPR Finite Element Analysis Finite Element Analysis Software greymatters Grounding HV Earthing HV Earthing Protection lightning lightning danger Lightning Protection lightning strikes Renewable Energy Rise of Earth Potential risk management ROEP Soil Resistivity Soil Resistivity Methods Soil Resistivity Testing Soil Resistivity Testing 10 Common Mistakes Soil Resistivity Testing Methods soil structure Step Potential Surge Protection Tag Archive - Lightning Strike Touch Potential what to do in a thunderstorm what to do when lightning strikes

Footer

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
GREYMATTERS PART OF THE GROUP OF COMPANIES © 2023