• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

GreyMatters

Electrical Earthing System Design & Soil Resistivity Testing

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Earthing Services
    • Earthing Design Services
    • Lightning Protection Design
  • Earthing Training Courses
  • XGSLab
    • XGSLab Services
    • XGSLab Online Demo
    • XGSLab Sales
  • Members Academy
Home » Ask the Experts Electrical Earthing Blog » 7 Deadly Sins … of Electrical Earthing … Part 2

21/05/2015 By Ian Leave a Comment

7 Deadly Sins … of Electrical Earthing … Part 2

In our previous post, 7 Deadly Sins of Electrical Earthing … Part 1, we introduced the 7 deadly sins of electrical earthing, up to and including Sin # 2.  We now explore sins 3 – 5.

Sin #3 – the Greed for land

The third sin (Greed) concerns underestimating how much land or real estate a properly designed electrical earthing system can occupy.  Every Electrical Earthing System is unique – even when designing multiple sites with identical electrical configurations – the soil structure will  have a massive influence on the final outcome.

Therefore, there is no fixed amount of land for a given system …

 … Gone are the days of saying “Put your electrical earthing mat in that corner over there please!”.

 … Gone are the days of asking for a defined Earth mat resistance, of say, <1 Ω.

 … Gone are the days of relying on hand calculations and approximations.

TODAY – knowing what we know about how a fault or lightning strike interacts with the Earth.  It is universally acknowledge that Safe Electrical Earthing Design is about controlling the surface potentials that occur as a result of a unplanned fault – known as the Rise of Earth Potential, or Earth Potential Rise.

This means, when the various elements combine, one scenario may only need a small amount of land for a safe electrical earthing solution; whereas, another may need to recruit a massive amount more of land to achieve the same result … why?  The soil structure!

Sin #3 is the Greed for land that a Electrical Earthing System can demand.  Be prepared.


Sin #4 – Sloth [laziness] of Legacy Methods

In today’s ‘informed’ world – There is no excuse for an unsafe or non-compliant Electrical Earthing System.  Hand calculations and circuit theory are known to introduce errors – sometimes significant errors.

Engineering today has the knowledge and software tools to take the guesswork out of inconveniently complex problems.  For Electrical Earthing that means Finite Element Analysis (FEA) using validated software such as CDEGS by qualified Electrical Earthing specialists. And the electromagnetic field versions of CDEGS provide an unparalleled level of accuracy which means safety and costs are optimised so that everyone can rest a little easier at night knowing the right amount of material (copper – not too much and not too little), has been used to reach a safe condition.

Sin #4 then is the laziness of not applying accepted, validated Electrical Earthing practice.


Sin # 5 – Wrath of errors

When dealing with human and/or critical asset safety in high-voltage environments (1,000 volts or greater) – there is usually a lot at stake.  Not only the lives of innocent by-standers but the professional reputations of many a large organisation can be wiped out in a heart beat by the misplaced apathy (or ignorance) concerning rates of errors by not using the correct tool for the system under study.

You may have heard old-school engineers recount the mantra “There’s a tool (or a person) for every job …  and a job for every tool (or person)” – so listen to the advice and choose your tool (or person) wisely to avoid the rage that can be created by avoidable errors!

Always consult a professionally accredited, qualified, Electrical Earthing Specialist who can deal with the complexity of grounding and electrical earthing systems.  [But I would say that wouldn’t I?!]

FEATURED IMAGE: memeburn.com


Inspired by the THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS OF ELECTRICAL Earthing DESIGN whitepaper published by E&S Grounding Solutions


[wptab name=’About’]

Ian Griffiths SelfieIan Griffiths

Ian is a Principal Consultant at GreyMatters, with 26 years experience solving HV earthing, EMC, and lightning problems for clients worldwide.  When he’s not busy studying problems and designing solutions, you can find him mountain biking, sailing and racing motorbikes in the summer.  In the winter he tends to head off to the mountains chasing the snow with friends and family.  Ian holds a Master’s Degree, and Degrees in both Mechanical and Electrical disciplines, and is one of the top 1% accredited CDEGS consultants and advisor to international utility companies, data-centre and infrastructure developers globally.

[/wptab] [wptab name=’Latest Posts’]

Recent Posts by Ian

7 Deadly Sins of Electrical Earthing … Part 1

50 Shades Freed – Unleashing CDEGS!

50 Shades Darker – CDEGS Myths Busted!

50 Shades of GreyMatters

[/wptab] [end_wptabset]

Filed Under: Electrical Earthing Tagged With: 7 Deadly Sins, BS7430, CDEGS, Earth mat resistance, earth potential rise, Earthing system design, Electrical Earthing, Electromagnetic Field Theory, EN 50522-2010, Finite Element Analysis Software, Grounding, Rise of Earth Potential, safety calculations, soil layer, soil structure, Wenner 4-point resistivity

Electrical Earthing Training – Free Trial

Do you want to understand more about Electrical Earthing System Design – Greymatters Academy is our Earthing Training site take a look or access your free trial here.

Recent Posts:

Ian getting ready

We take a look at soil resistivity and provide practical advice on what is ground soil resistivity, why we measure it and these common mistakes when Soil Resistivity Testing:

Soil Resistivity Testing Methods Wenner 4 Probe Test

Soil Resistivity Testing Methods a popular post. Originally published in 2013 and now updated. A Wenner probe test is a geotechnical investigation method used to determine the electrical resistivity of the soil. Soil resistivity testing can be carried out using different methods. The Wenner 4 Probe test is one of the most common soil resistivity […]

Schlumberger Array

The Schlumberger array is a geotechnical investigation method which determines the electrical resistivity of the soil. This is similar to the Wenner probe test, but it uses multiple current electrodes rather than just two. This allows for a more detailed and accurate measurement of soil resistivity. Soil resistivity testing carried out using different methods, this […]

Driven Rod Method

The driven rod test is a geotechnical investigation method which determines the resistance of soil to the penetration of a rod or other penetrometer.  The Soil resistivity is determined using different Soil Resistivity Testing methods. However the Driven Rod, described below is the last of the three most popular Soil Resistivity Testing methods we use […]

2022 webinar - the highlights

Knowing in today’s world it’s all about time. We’ve summarise hours of technical content into this 20-minute bite-sized session, including the key highlights from the 2022 webinar series. If you missed it, watch the webinar replay here. In this webinar we cover:

About Ian

This post is written by Ian Griffiths, Principal Engineer at GreyMatters, an Earthing & Lightning Consultant of 28 years, one of the top 1% accredited CDEGS and XGSLab consultants and professional advisor to international utility companies, data centre and infrastructure developers.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

GreyMatters Accreditations

GreyMatters Accreditations

Online Earthing Courses

Free Trial Learn More

Free Online Course – Learn Ohms Law in 10 minutes or less!

Learn Ohms Law

Blog Categories

  • Acadamy (2)
  • Anti-Theft (1)
  • CDEGS (6)
  • Earth Testing (6)
  • Earthing Designs (7)
  • Earthing System Design (16)
  • Earthing Systems (5)
  • Electrical Earthing (38)
  • Energy Modelling Software (1)
  • General Post (10)
  • Grounding (1)
  • Lightning (11)
  • Lightning Protection Design (16)
  • Lightning Strike (1)
  • Renewable Energy (2)
  • Soil Resistivity (18)
  • Soil Resistivity Testing (10)
  • Solar (4)
  • XGSLab Updates (3)

Tag Cloud

BS7430 BS EN 50522 CDEGS data centres earth electrode Earthing earthing design earthing protection earthing standards Earthing system design earthing systems earth potential rise earth systems Electrical Earthing System Design Electromagnetic Field Theory electromagnetic interference EMI EN 50522 EPR Finite Element Analysis Finite Element Analysis Software greymatters Grounding HV Earthing HV Earthing Protection lightning lightning danger Lightning Protection lightning strikes Renewable Energy Rise of Earth Potential risk management ROEP Soil Resistivity Soil Resistivity Methods Soil Resistivity Testing Soil Resistivity Testing 10 Common Mistakes Soil Resistivity Testing Methods soil structure Step Potential Surge Protection Tag Archive - Lightning Strike Touch Potential what to do in a thunderstorm what to do when lightning strikes

Footer

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
GREYMATTERS PART OF THE GROUP OF COMPANIES © 2023