Soil Resistivity Testing – 3 Helpful Tips to Avoid The Most Common Mistakes

Soil Resistivity Testing – 3 Helpful Tips to Avoid The Most Common Mistakes

Soil Resistivity Testing

We receive a lot of questions asking how to do a Wenner test or What are the steps in a soil resistivity testing. The key thing to take away is that once you have the appropriate equipment**… the act of ‘doing’ a Wenner Soil Resistivity Test is not that complicated.  However, you must take a consistent, systematic approach to the task, otherwise, the chances of error creeping-in are high and will appear discretely, sometimes without you noticing (unless you have the means to process the data on-site during the task).

It’s imperative to understand, errors in the data at this early stage of the process for electrical earthing design can be disastrous.  Disastrous for safety from the system, and disastrous from a functional perspective for the earthing system (grounding).

Soil Resistivity Testing
Ian in the field – Soil Resistivity Testing

So, in this video, we take a real-life scenario in the mountains (Wind Turbine farm) and point out a few tips and ‘tricks of the trade’ to reduce error when carrying out Wenner soil resistivity testing in geologically challenging terrain.

** Sufficient signal strength from the instruments must penetrate for the ground structure under-study. Therefore enabling adequate sounding-depth. Also, analysis for the subsequent Soil Model produced for a safe HV Earthing Design.

In-video Introduction [00:00]

We’ve got our tester kit, consisting of two DET 2’s, a set of leads (pairs, e.g. 4 leads in total), the leads span 300 metres total, so we’re getting probe spacings up to 100 metres.

We’ve got multiple copper rods, in this case, because we’re sitting on granite [cough].  We want to be able to get as maximised contact with the surface layer as possible so that we can get [cough] good return signal.

Often, you won’t get a chance to take soundings directly on construction sites. Because it’s too busy. And, too much plant. Together with, too many risks. And the ground itself probably made up. So it’s of little real value because it’s all kind of imported.

[1:00]  So hunt out … [in this case we’ve gone a little bit Ray Mears, if you’re not familiar with Ray Mears – he’s a survival expert] but anyway we’ve gone a little bit Ray Mears outside of the construction site, to find a place that has been undisturbed – and here we are in the forest.

[1:16]  We’ve just laid out the pins – first pin and point leads, the first pin is about, [I dunno] 10 inches apart spaced – this sets the trend for analysis later on.

[1:29]  It’s really important you get a close spacing, first of all. Also, to see where the tipping point is for the layers.

[1:36]  So, the next phase is really getting the spacings out. To about 54 – 100 metre intervals. So, we’re on about a 300 metre run (of leads) into the forest.

TIP 1:  Multiple Probes [01:58]

Right, we’re using multiple probes to increase the surface contact. Also, with the signal on the sounding. So, we get a good return and more reliable resistivity test results, basically.

[2:15]  This is what they look like, the potential probe on one side, then we’ve got three probes on the other.  The mole grips are there because it’s practicably all we had available. But just to give you an idea.

[2:26]  We’re using copper probes, driven to about 3 inches – 4 inches deep, with multiple stack connectors on, which then go into the leads [I can show you … these particular leads have seen a bit of action, but anyway], it just gives you an idea of what we’re doing, and cos the [multiple] on the current signals especially, multiple probes they allow better connection, so you’ve effectively got a much bigger probe area in contact … it sends s decent signal through, for the instrument to pick up … that’s the theory.

[3:21] [try and get you in focus … there you go … all good] … 51.8 – mark that off against the probe spacing. And then what happens then is that is the rule reading. – So, it then gets processed. Software processed. – Therefore, to actually give the correct, apparent reading. And this we repeat numerous soundings. Up to 300-metre spacings sometimes. So, it can be quite a time-consuming activity.

Tip 2:  Surface Test [4:03]

A really useful tip for the modelling side of soil resistivity is to get the immediate surface layer tests and sounded – which means probe spacings typically 4 – 6 inches apart [don’t know if you can see that] but this is just to set the trend when it comes to the analysis side of things.

[4:34]  So a useful tip. – Get that in, it may not form part of the formal report. But it does set the scene for the model analysis.

Tip 3:  Angle [4:50]

To improve the connection on the signal – its slightly at an angle as well so you have more surface contact.

[5:08] credits

Soil Resistivity Helpful Tips Video by GreyMatters – You may like Soil Resistivity Testing “Stuck in the Mud!”

Engage with us…

  • Earthing Design Services & Lightning Protection Design – If high voltage power systems and lightning are causing you concern why not see how we can help with a quick ‘live chat’ below as a start.
  • XGSLab – A complete software tool for the simulation of  Power, Earthing, Grounding and Lightning Systems, get in touch to request a free demo.
  • Get Certified – Start your journey to become certified in Power Systems Earthing & Design.

more insights

Ian getting ready
Soil Resistivity

Soil Resistivity Testing – Common Mistakes

We take a look at soil resistivity and provide practical advice on what is ground soil resistivity, why we measure it and these common mistakes when Soil Resistivity Testing: