What is Step and Touch Potential? And How Can You Reduce it's Risk

Awareness of step and touch potential, caused by earth potential rise, is important for anyone working on high-voltage power transmission and distribution systems above 1 kV.

Earth Potential Rise

Earth Potential Rise (EPR) is caused by electrical faults that occur at electrical substations, power plants, or high-voltage transmission lines. Therefore short-circuit current flows through the plant structure and equipment and into the earthing electrode.  Since the Soil Resistivity is not zero, any current injected into the earth at the earth electrode produces a 'Rise of Earth Potential'. This earth potential rise (EPR) is with respect to an infinitely distant reference point. The resulting earth potential rise can cause hazardous voltage, many hundreds of metres away from the actual fault location. Many factors determine the level of hazard, including: available fault current, soil type, soil moisture, temperature, underlying rock layers, and clearing time to interrupt the fault.

Earth potential rise is a safety issue in the coordination of power and telecommunications services. An EPR event at a site such as an electrical distribution substation may expose personnel, users or structures to hazardous voltages. These hazards are referred to as Step and Touch Potential hazards.

step and touch potential image

Step Potential Body Current

Step Potential is the voltage between the feet of a person standing near an energized earthed object. It is equal to the difference in voltage, given by the voltage distribution curve, between two points at different distances from the "electrode". A person could be at risk of injury during a fault simply by standing near the connected object.

Touch Potential Body Current

Touch potentials are defined as the difference between the maximum Earth Potential Rise (EPR) and the minimum surface potential within a 1 m radius of earthed plant.   There are cases where the touch potential could be nearly the full voltage across the earthed object if that object is earthed at a point remote from the place where the person is in contact with it. For example, a crane that was earthed to the system neutral and that contacted an energized line would expose any person in contact with the crane or its uninsulated load line to a touch potential nearly equal to the full fault.

Charles Dalziel

The person who pioneered much of the early work into how the human body responds to electrocution was Charles Dalziel, pictured below.  He actually conducted experiments studying his own body responses to electrocution ... presumably there were not many volunteers for the task!!!  Fortunately, he did survive (86 yrs young) and the results from his experiments formed the basis of IEC 60479-1, Effects of Current on Human Beings and Livestock.


What Dalziel was able to determine is that response to stress voltages is probabilistic in nature, which means that once a given threshold is accepted as tolerable, not everyone in a given general population is going to survive!  This is because every individual is different, has differing tolerance to the stress voltage before the heart fibrillates.  For example, an elderly person with a heart condition or very young child is likely to be more 'at risk' than say a fit/healthy adult.

To this day there remains some controversy between EU regions and authorities regarding where the touch and step threshold voltages should sit.  However, with recent amendments to the IEC standards, the remaining area of ambiguity largely centre’s on the selection of appropriate fault clearance times.

Step and Touch Potential hazards

Based on the recent amendments to BS EN 50522 and IEEE Std.81, Step and Touch voltage safety has become the driving criterion for safe Earthing/Grounding Design.  It used to be the 1-ohm earth mat that would ensure safety but this is no-longer the case.  Current wisdom and best practices adopted by both the IEEE and IEC bodies agree that the true hazard posed by a Rise of Earth Potential is whether the human heart (or given animal) can withstand (survive) the current flow resulting from a difference in potential when touching a piece of equipment or standing nearby, e.g. the step and touch voltage or potential.



Step Potential & Touch Potential Risk to the heart illustration

You can see in the image above, that the heart is further away from the body currents in the Step Potential case, whereas, in the Touch Potential scenario the electrons flow almost directly through/around the heart itself.  Ignoring shoe resistance, this is a key reason why the permissible voltage thresholds for Step Potentials can be far higher than those for Touch Potential.

Reducing the Risks - Step and Touch Potential

Once a Rise of Earth Potential Study has identified the risks - There are a number of basic essential measures available to the specialist Earthing Consultant to reduce step and touch risks (mitigation).  The complexity comes in knowing how to apply, combine and configure these into a robust earthing solution that controls and maintains the surface voltages in such as way as to not exceed the permissible thresholds of the heart AND within the practical financial constraints of a budget.   Some of the hardware to incorporate in a design includes:

  1. Grading conductors
  2. Conductor meshes
  3. Vertical electrodes
  4. Horizontal electrodes
  5. Deep bore electrodes
  6. Counterpoise electrodes
  7. Earthed planes
  8. Rod groups
  9. Proper Bonding arrangements
  10. Ground conditioning agents*
  11. High resistance surface layers, such as, crushed rock, stone, rubber, tarmac, etc.*

* For most cases, high resistivity surface layers should be considered more as a secondary mitigation method, e.g. the earthing strategy should be to achieve a safe base design (where practicable) without surface layer mitigation or soil conditioning agents.

Other non-hardware related mitigation may include a Risk Management Approach where the risks are 'managed' through the application of processes and/or procedures to avoid injury.

If you would like to know more about this or any other topic contact us or click on the live chat below.

Ian Griffiths SelfieIan Griffiths

Ian is a Principal Consultant at GreyMatters, with 26 years experience solving HV earthing, EMC, and lightning problems for clients worldwide. When he’s not busy studying problems and designing solutions, you can find him mountain biking, sailing and racing motorbikes in the summer. In the winter he tends to head off to the mountains chasing the snow with friends and family. Ian holds a Master’s Degree, and Degrees in both Mechanical and Electrical disciplines, and is one of the top 1% accredited CDEGS consultants and advisor to international utility companies, data-centre and infrastructure developers globally.

Tagged: , , , , ,

"Working with GreyMatters has totally changed my expectations of a professional engineering consultancy firm … for the better! Technically, they were on the money! More importantly however ... they kept me updated throughout the entire project, which was so refreshing, and therefore quickly put my mind at ease that things were being taken care of." (C. Turgis)
  • subsea 7
  • Atkins
  • Siemens
  • Hydro66
  • Western Power Distribution
  • National Grid
  • BAM Nuttall
  • Rotary Building Services
  • M&W Group
  • Valero
  • Technip
  • Royal Airforce
  • PM Group
  • MOD
  • ISG
  • Ineos
  • Exelis
  • Essar
  • Deerns
  • Network Rail
  • AWE