• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

GreyMatters

Electrical Earthing System Design & Soil Resistivity Testing

  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Earthing Services
    • Earthing Design Services
    • Earth Monitoring System
    • Lightning Protection Design
    • Earthing Training Courses
  • Earthing Solutions
  • XGSLab
    • XGSLab Services
    • XGSLab Online Demo
    • XGSLab Sales
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Electrical Earthing / Earthing System Design / Myth Busting – Hot-sites. 5 reasons why a hot-site does not mean it’s a dangerous site!

12/01/2016 By Ian Leave a Comment

Myth Busting – Hot-sites. 5 reasons why a hot-site does not mean it’s a dangerous site!

What is ‘HOT-ZONE’ or ‘Hot-Site’?

There are so many misconceptions surrounding the whole concept of a‘Hot-Site’ and ‘Hot-Zoning’ for Electrical Earthing Designs.  In this article, I attempt to simplify what ‘Hot Zone’ (or Hot Site) means in Power System terms AND crucially, explain what a ‘Hot Zone’ is not.

By the end of this article, you should hopefully understand that just because a site classified as a ‘Hot Site’, it does not mean it is necessarily unsafe.

Hot Site Basics – Earth Potential Rise (EPR)

If you know how an Earth Potential Rise (EPR) or Rise of Earth Potential (RoEP) occurs, then you can skip this bit.  If not read on.

When a part of an Electrical Power System suffers a fault, it usually means there’s a short circuit somewhere.  Often the short circuit can occur between one of the ‘phase conductors’ and the Earth. (To keep things simple, that’s the scenario we’re going to stick with here)

Take a minute and watch the video below – 26 seconds in, one of the phase conductors shown detaching itself from the supporting structure and dropping to the ground.  What happens next is a representation of the Earth Potential Rise process, e.g. the energy inside the phase conductor released into the soil, and a rise in the surface voltage is created locally where the conductor dropped, which over time expands out across a given distance [In the video is it shown by colour contours bleeding/expanding across the site].

If you prefer a more physical analogy, it’s a bit like dropping a pebble into a pool of calm water. With the water analogy, the pebble has a store of kinetic energy (mass x velocity = KE), which transfers into the water, creating ripples.

The more KE, the bigger the magnitude of the ripples. If we consider these ripples to equate to the electrical voltage contours of Earth Potential Rise (EPR), then these will expand from the point of impact and extend out.

However, as the contours extend, so their magnitude decays with distance as the energy descends into the soil on its return journey back to its source (Earth Return). Therefore, most of the energy released will be present (momentarily at least) at the epicentre of the fault.

So, having explained a little bit about how and why the Earth Potential Rise takes place, we can move on to defining the term ‘Hot Zone’…

‘HOT-ZONE’ – What does it mean?

The Hot Zone or Electrical Hot Earth defined as the Earth Potential Rise (EPR) which extends in a radius from any bonded metalwork to the site’s Electrical Earth Electrode System or Main Earthing System (MES) that exceeds a magic number of volts. This ‘magical’ number of volts determined by the relevant national authority for each country, and will vary from country to country – but the principle remains once the EPR magnitude exceeds the threshold voltage, the sites now defined as being ‘Hot’.

The extent and shape of this ‘hot’ surface-voltage contour known as the ‘Hot Zone’.  In the States, this Hot threshold set at 300 V.  But for the IEC based countries, the picture gets a little more confusing…

Hot Zone - Hot Site

EA TS 36 – when is a site Hot or Cold?

For European and IEC based countries, the magnitude used to define this ‘Hot’ threshold subjected to the site’s protection settings (clearance times).

For example, a site that can clear a given fault reliably and quickly (e.g. within 200 ms) can behave a higher EPR before it falls into the classification of being ‘Hot’ than say, another site that clears its faults in much longer times, say, 1 second for argument’s sake.

The concept of defining ‘high reliability’ vs ‘normal reliability’ is hugely relevant.  After all, a high-reliability site will be able to restrict the amount of energy released before isolation much more efficiently compared with those sites that do not have the same level of control or protection.

This level of protection is why the high-reliability sites have ‘Hot’ voltage threshold than the regular reliability sites; given the resulting hazard from touch and step voltages are proportionally lower for sites with a quicker clearance time (protection).

In the UK, the Hot Zone historically measured as anywhere within 100 m of the boundary of the high voltage compound at a Hot Site.  However, since 2007 it is allowable to use the Energy Networks Association (ENA) Recommendation S34 – A Guide for Assessing the Rise of Earth Potential at Substation Sites, to calculate the Hot Zone.  This guideline currently defined as a contour line marking where the Rise of Earth Potential (ROEP) exceeds 430V for regular reliability power lines or 650V for high-reliability lines.

So, you’ve got a site that’s classified ‘Hot Site’ – now what?

hot zone

Don’t panic!  The Hot/Cold classification is simply part of a formal Risk Management process that allows the asset owner to register the site as a ‘hot site’ and inform other parties that a hazard ‘may’ exist – A sort of red flag or indicator.

If a site defined as a Hot Site, it’s ‘Zone’ (extent) will also need to be calculated.  Software tools like CDEGS widely accepted as the preferred method/tool of choice to establish the Hot Zone contour(s).

In some circumstances (such as when a ‘cold’ site upgraded to ‘hot’ status), the Hot Zone may take in residential or commercial property which is not within the property of the site’s owner.  In these cases, an assessment needs to establish if the Hot Zone EPR exceeds a second ‘actionable’ level.

The second ‘actionable’ level defined as the contour line marking where the Rise of Earth Potential (ROEP) that exceeds 1,150 V for standard reliability protection and 1,700 V for high-reliability systems, confused?

Don’t be, Noise regulations in the EU follow a similar approach.  For example, the Noise at Work Regs has a lower (80 dB) and upper exposure action value (85 dB) for the lower level, guidance that’s all it needs; it’s when reaching the higher threshold that controls are mandatory, and the Hot Zone principle adopts a similar methodology as below table lays out.

 Normal ReliabilityHigh ReliabilityWhat to do
First level EPR value430 V650 VEnter site details on the national register
Second level EPR Value1,150 V1,700 VAction Controls/mitigation

What does ‘Hot’ NOT mean?

It is a common misconception to think that just because a site has an EPR that exceeds the first level (430 V or 650 V), as Energy Networks Association (ENA) Recommendation S34 that the site is unsafe to enter or to work inside this zone.  This recommendation, by itself, is not the case.

When a substation or site classified as ‘hot’ within the first action level, it is providing a management trigger for Risk Management measures to be considered… It’s when it exceeds the SECOND action level that then controls measures required to mitigate.

Let me repeat that! – Just because a site has reached level 1, the ‘Hot’ classification does not mean that mitigation measures are automatically required.  Since 2007 under S34, mitigation required when the second action level gets exceeded.

What do Hot Zone control measures look like?

Control Measures may include several actions depending on configuration, and these include (not exhaustive):

  • Appropriately designed Earthing arrangements to satisfy permissible touch & step safety voltage thresholds
  • Ensure sufficient maintenance and inspection
  • Isolation of incoming/out-going telecommunications cabling
  • Informing 3rd parties as appropriate

Maybe we will explore the control measures in a subsequent blog.

This principle is probably one of the more misunderstood concepts within Electrical Earthing Design, so reach out via live chat or contact us to access a bit more GreyMatter on the subject and we can demystify a little more.

Filed Under: Earthing System Design Tagged With: BS7430, Earth Potenial Rise, Electrical Earthing System Design, EPR, Hot Site, Hot Zone, Rise of Earth Potential, ROEP

Electrical Earthing Training – Free Trial

Do you want to understand more about Electrical Earthing System Design – Greymatters Academy is our Earthing Training site take a look or access your free trial here.

Recent Posts:

Are you feeling overwhelmed or out of your depth, well stop. Test drive our new online Training for Earthing courses. And say goodbye to PowerPoint slides forever! I don’t care how many tips and fixes there are out there on the info-web that claim to make boring training for earthing PowerPoint (PPT) slides less boring… […]

Comparing CDEGS with XGSLab

In his previous blog, Ian explained our decision to work with XGSLab, on the basis that it is an equally capable tool as CDEGS, that is much easier to use. In this blog, I’m going under to hood, so to speak. Comparing CDEGS with XGSLab to show you some real-world examples where CDEGS and XGSLab […]

XGSLab Electromagnetic Simulation Software

Since 2016, Greymatters prime purpose is to protect life. More personally, my goal is explicitly to save at least one life before I head off to the pearly gates and return into space dust. Knowing we’re focused on saving lives through the work we do. It makes sense that everything we do supports this goal, […]

Soil Resistivity Testing

Ground testing is typically performed in two stages. The first is conducted during the construction of a building to ensure proper installation of the electrical system. And the second involves routine ground testing to ensure the ‘actual’ arrangements perform as ‘predicted’ at the design stage. Thus, to avoid costly and fatal errors. What is the […]

Electrical earth testing can be a real challenge in built-up areas. Not only are there very few soft areas to deploy the test probes, but underground cabling and conductive structures are everywhere. These two factors massively affect the measured readings leading to measured values that bear no relation to the actual electrode tested.  Therefore, what […]

Earthing System Design A Probabilistic Approach

What are the procedures for creating an HV Earthing System Design? Also, how might these differ from an LV Earth design? Firstly, although the principles underpinning HV and LV earthing are similar, the approaches are very different. Probabilistic Approach The first huge difference is the recognition that HV electrical earthing design is probabilistic in nature. […]

About Ian

This post is written by Ian Griffiths, Principal Engineer at GreyMatters, an Earthing & Lightning Consultant of 27 years, one of the top 1% accredited CDEGS consultants and professional advisor to international utility companies, data centre and infrastructure developers.

Reader Interactions

You must log in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Online Earthing Courses

Dominate Your Sector with
The GreyMatters Academy

Free Trial Learn More

Our Top Earthing Post

Electrical Fault Theory

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog Categories

  • Acadamy (2)
  • Anti-Theft (2)
  • Carbon Footprint (2)
  • CDEGS (5)
  • Earth Testing (5)
  • Earthing System Design (15)
  • Earthing Systems (7)
  • Eco (8)
  • Electrical Earthing (34)
  • General Post (44)
  • Lightning (10)
  • Lightning Protection Design (15)
  • Lightning Strike (3)
  • Newsletters (4)
  • Renewable Energy (7)
  • Soil Resistivity (16)
  • Soil Resistivity Testing (10)
  • Solar (8)
  • Wind (2)

Tag Cloud

BS7430 BS EN 50522 CDEGS copper theft data centres Earthing earthing design earthing standards Earthing system design earthing systems earth potential rise Eco Electrical Earthing System Design Electromagnetic Field Theory electromagnetic interference EMI EN 50522 Energy EPR Finite Element Analysis Finite Element Analysis Software gm people greymatters Grounding Helpful Tips In the Media lightning lightning danger Lightning Protection lightning strikes News newsletter Renewables Rise of Earth Potential ROEP Soil Resistivity Soil Resistivity Testing Soil Resistivity Testing 10 Common Mistakes Soil Resistivity Testing Methods soil structure solar south africa Tag Archive - Lightning Strike Videos what to do in a thunderstorm

Footer

Contact GreyMatters

Bristol and Bath Science Park
Dirac Crescent
Emersons Green
Bristol
BS16 7FR
+44 (0) 117 247 0050
hello@greymattersglobal.com
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Cookies

Copyright GreyMatters © 2019

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Read more.