• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

GreyMatters

Electrical Earthing System Design & Soil Resistivity Testing

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Earthing Services
    • Earthing Design Services
    • Lightning Protection Design
  • Earthing Training Courses
  • XGSLab
    • XGSLab Services
    • XGSLab Online Demo
    • XGSLab Sales
  • Members Academy
Home » Ask the Experts Electrical Earthing Blog » 50 Shades Darker – CDEGS Myths Busted!

26/03/2015 By Ian Leave a Comment

50 Shades Darker – CDEGS Myths Busted!

CDEGS Modelling Software demystified!

It’s interesting how the psychology of the car has found a place in our daily lives.  How many times have you asked or been asked ‘what car do you drive?’

If you’re one of the lucky few that own a Ferrari (unfortunately, I am not one of those!) – you might receive a different response than if you own a Nissan Micra.  The common thread is that there are both ‘cars’ aimed to transport you from A to B – but each one has been designed, developed and delivered to fit two very different budgets and to two very different purposes.

When to ask for black or white – not all CDEGS Modelling Software are the same!

 

CDEGS Modelling Software Demystified

In the land of cars, we measure performance in terms of acceleration (0-60 MPH), top speed, economy (MPG), ecology (g/CO2) or lap times if you’re a Top Gear fan …

In Earthing – the key performance measures (for EN 50522, 50122-1) are a function of accuracy % error, complexity, and/or correlation to reality.  The trouble is, one of the best-kept secrets is that different versions of “CDEGS Modelling Software” also exist – From the £7,000 Nissan Micra to the £200,000 Ferrari 488.

So, next time you receive a fee proposal for an Earthing Study that claims to be CDEGS compliant – ask the provider ‘what version/module of the CDEGS Modelling Software are you intending to use?’ Why (you might ask)?

The chief reason boils down to the engine that powers the modules – some modules, like MALT and MALZ rely on ‘Circuit Theory’.  Others, such as HI-FREQ are based in ‘Electromagnetic Field Theory’.

Why does this matter?

Two words … ERROR RATE.   If your application is on the simpler, smaller end of the earth design spectrum, with lower fault energisation levels; then the more budget sensitive versions of the CDEGS  Modelling Software which are based in Circuit Theory may be sufficient… but as the complexity and/or the size increases, so will the rate of error increases – sometimes as much as 50%.

Think about it – let’s say there’s a 6 kA fault with a 50% split factor.  This means there’s 3 kA going through the Main Earth System to earth.  For ease of calculation, let’s assume the Earth is 1 Ω impedance, which means the basic Earth Potential Rise (EPR) for the system should be around the 3 kV mark.

But what if the software module selected has underestimated the EPR by 50%?  This would lead to a 1.5 kV difference in predicted verses actual – is this significant??

I accept in this scenario mentioned, it’s not possible to be definitive without understanding a bit more about the circumstances but taking this at face value, an underestimate of 1.5 kV could have a significant impact on the touch/step safety – without putting too fine a point on it, enough to kill.

So, an upgrade in the computational engine is required for the larger, longer, more commonly encountered earth designs or studies for ‘power systems’, which can take account of mutual coupling effects, inductance, capacitance, e.g. the calculations are not limited to just the conductive/resistive effects.

Armed with an Electromagnetic Field Theory engine, the risk of error is mitigated – typically by an order of magnitude lower, which means we can all sleep at night because the design is using robust, accurate, low levels of error, based in the latest accepted science for its calculations.

If you have a ‘critical’ asset or infrastructure project – then the standard requirement has to be the elimination (or reduction at least) of error that can be easily avoided.  In most cases, this can be achieved by simply being more aware of the choices available and the residual risk in the modules used.  Knowingly or otherwise, no-one wants to be haunted by easily avoidable errors.

There’s a bewildering quantity of CDEGS modelling software modules – so if you’re not sure whether what is being used on your project is fit for purpose – drop us a line on our live chat facility below … for a super quick response.

Featured Image:  LaFerrari

 

Regular readers of this blog will know GreyMatters have championed CDEGS for many years. But now there is a viable and attractive alternative to CDEGS. I explain “Why I chose this alternative” in this article. And compare several past projects, done with CDEGS and the alternative – in this article.

Engage with us…

  • Earthing Design Services & Lightning Protection Design – If high voltage power systems and lightning are causing you concern why not see how we can help with a quick ‘live chat’ below as a start.
  • XGSLab – A complete software tool for the simulation of  Power, Earthing, Grounding and Lightning Systems, get in touch to request a free demo.
  • Get Certified – Start your journey to become certified in Power Systems Earthing & Design.
  • E-Learning – Introduction to Earthing, get a free trial here.
  • Get answers quickly using the searchable Technical Blog section.

Filed Under: CDEGS Tagged With: 50122-1, BS7430, CDEGS, earth electrode, earth systems, Earthing, earthing design, Electromagnetic Field Theory, electromagnetic interference, EMF, EMI, EN 50522, greymatters, HI-FREQ, MALT, MALZ, safety earth, soil structure

Electrical Earthing Training – Free Trial

Do you want to understand more about Electrical Earthing System Design – Greymatters Academy is our Earthing Training site take a look or access your free trial here.

Recent Posts:

Ian getting ready

We take a look at soil resistivity and provide practical advice on what is ground soil resistivity, why we measure it and these common mistakes when Soil Resistivity Testing:

Soil Resistivity Testing Methods Wenner 4 Probe Test

Soil Resistivity Testing Methods a popular post. Originally published in 2013 and now updated. A Wenner probe test is a geotechnical investigation method used to determine the electrical resistivity of the soil. Soil resistivity testing can be carried out using different methods. The Wenner 4 Probe test is one of the most common soil resistivity […]

Schlumberger Array

The Schlumberger array is a geotechnical investigation method which determines the electrical resistivity of the soil. This is similar to the Wenner probe test, but it uses multiple current electrodes rather than just two. This allows for a more detailed and accurate measurement of soil resistivity. Soil resistivity testing carried out using different methods, this […]

Driven Rod Method

The driven rod test is a geotechnical investigation method which determines the resistance of soil to the penetration of a rod or other penetrometer.  The Soil resistivity is determined using different Soil Resistivity Testing methods. However the Driven Rod, described below is the last of the three most popular Soil Resistivity Testing methods we use […]

2022 webinar - the highlights

Knowing in today’s world it’s all about time. We’ve summarise hours of technical content into this 20-minute bite-sized session, including the key highlights from the 2022 webinar series. If you missed it, watch the webinar replay here. In this webinar we cover:

About Ian

This post is written by Ian Griffiths, Principal Engineer at GreyMatters, an Earthing & Lightning Consultant of 28 years, one of the top 1% accredited CDEGS and XGSLab consultants and professional advisor to international utility companies, data centre and infrastructure developers.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

GreyMatters Accreditations

GreyMatters Accreditations

Online Earthing Courses

Free Trial Learn More

Free Online Course – Learn Ohms Law in 10 minutes or less!

Learn Ohms Law

Blog Categories

  • Acadamy (2)
  • Anti-Theft (1)
  • CDEGS (6)
  • Earth Testing (6)
  • Earthing Designs (7)
  • Earthing System Design (16)
  • Earthing Systems (5)
  • Electrical Earthing (38)
  • Energy Modelling Software (1)
  • General Post (10)
  • Grounding (1)
  • Lightning (11)
  • Lightning Protection Design (16)
  • Lightning Strike (1)
  • Renewable Energy (2)
  • Soil Resistivity (18)
  • Soil Resistivity Testing (10)
  • Solar (4)
  • XGSLab Updates (3)

Tag Cloud

BS7430 BS EN 50522 CDEGS data centres earth electrode Earthing earthing design earthing protection earthing standards Earthing system design earthing systems earth potential rise earth systems Electrical Earthing System Design Electromagnetic Field Theory electromagnetic interference EMI EN 50522 EPR Finite Element Analysis Finite Element Analysis Software greymatters Grounding HV Earthing HV Earthing Protection lightning lightning danger Lightning Protection lightning strikes Renewable Energy Rise of Earth Potential risk management ROEP Soil Resistivity Soil Resistivity Methods Soil Resistivity Testing Soil Resistivity Testing 10 Common Mistakes Soil Resistivity Testing Methods soil structure Step Potential Surge Protection Tag Archive - Lightning Strike Touch Potential what to do in a thunderstorm what to do when lightning strikes

Footer

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
GREYMATTERS PART OF THE GROUP OF COMPANIES © 2023