• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

GreyMatters

Electrical Earthing System Design & Soil Resistivity Testing

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Earthing Services
    • Earthing Design Services
    • Lightning Protection Design
  • Earthing Training Courses
  • XGSLab
    • XGSLab Services
    • XGSLab Online Demo
    • XGSLab Sales
  • Members Academy
Home » Ask the Experts Electrical Earthing Blog » Comparison between XGSLab and CDEGS

27/11/2019 By Hugh Leave a Comment

Comparison between XGSLab and CDEGS

In this blog, I’m going under to hood, so to speak. Comparing CDEGS with XGSLab to show you some real-world examples where CDEGS and XGSLab give almost identical results.

Therefore, in all of these examples, we have completed and verified the earthing design for these sites and found good agreement between the modelled results and the post-installation measurements. On this basis, we can say that XGSLab matches CDEGS for accuracy, and both tools have good agreement with the real-world measurements.

Comparing CDEGS with XGSLab

Comparing CDEGS with XGSLab – General Introduction

As a result, the 3 examples presented, we are comparing results from CDEGS HIFREQ against results from XGSA_FD. These are the high-end packages, offering the best agreement with the real world, particularly in low soil resistivity situations, such as those in example 2. So, for each example, we give an outline of the project, and then present the EPR at the point of fault. Together with, the EPR contour plot provided by each tool. 

And, for consistency, the same soil models are used for both tools, generated using CDEGS RESAP. A future blog will look at the comparison between CDEGS RESAP and XGS SRA (Soil Resistivity Analyser)

Example 1

This is a wind turbine project, located in the countryside near Cardigan in Wales. The Wind Turbine connects to the 11 kV distribution network via a wood pole line with a small package substation to the bottom left. A transformer located at the base of the turbine feeds a Farmhouse (not included in the model. A key requirement on this project was to keep the hot contours away from the Farmhouse and other 3rd parties.

Soil Model

Example 1 Soil Model

CDEGS HIFREQ

CDEQS HIFREQ Model Plan View
CDEQS HIFREQ Model Isometric View
CDEGS HIFRQ EPR - Conductors
CDEGS HIFRQ EPR - Soil Surface

Another note is that the first phase of the model, where CDEGS determines the current distribution (and therefore the voltages) in the conductors, takes 10 minutes to run on my PC. The second phase, where it determines the voltages at the soil service takes 15 minutes

XGSA_FD

XGSA_FD Model Layout
XGSA_FD EPR - Conductors

In the latest release, XGSA_FD takes 45 seconds to perform the first phase of modelling and 30 minutes to run the 2nd phase

XGSA_FD EPR - Soil Surface

Comparison

ItemCDEGS HIFREQ EPR (V)XGSA_FD EPR (V)Difference (%)
Value356035610.03

Example 2

This is a 33 kV substation that was constructed as the point of connection for 2 large scale solar farms near Bristol. 

Soil Model

CDEGS HIFREQ

XGSA_FD

Comparison

ItemCDEGS HIFREQ EPR (V)XGSA_FD EPR (V)Difference (%)
Value286.8287.60.27

Example 3

This is energy from a waste site located near London. There are 2 generators located on-site, each with a dedicated grid connection, with the point of connection on an isolated earth electrode. This model simulates an earth fault in the larger building.

Soil Model

CDEGS HIFREQ

XGSA_FD

Comparison

ItemCDEGS HIFREQ EPR (V)XGSA_FD EPR (V)Difference (%)
Value41.4241.400.06

Conclusions

In these example cases, we’ve shown that in all cases, XGSLab and CDEGS have an extremely good agreement. The team at SINT Ingegneria have produced papers showing that XGSLab produces results matching the standard examples in IEEE 80.

So the difference we found between XGSLab and CDEGS

ItemCDEGS HIFREQ EPR (V)XGSA_FD EPR (V)Difference (%)
Example 1356035610.03
Example 2286.8287.60.27
Example 341.4241.400.06

Comparing XGSLab and CDEGS, a key point of difference is in conductor segmentation. The default CDEGS segmentation can lead to poor accuracy, particularly in low resistivity soil structures like those in example 2. In comparison, XGSLab makes assigning segmentation for the whole model a 1 click process, and the default segmentation option leads to much better accuracy. Obviously, any increase in segmentation level is likely to lead to an increase in computation time. However, getting the accuracy right is more important, and in my experience, a few minutes increase in computation time is not as important as getting things right the first time. It is likely that the increased difference in example 2 can be put down to the difference in segmentation approaches

XGSLab UK Agents – GreyMatters

XGSLab Guarantee
We are so confident Comparing CDEGS to XGLab we offer this personal GUARANTEE!

Now we’ve shown that for comparable models XGSLab and CDEGS will give the same results. So, why not get in touch to request a demo and see for yourself how easy it is to use XGSLab.

Filed Under: Electrical Earthing Tagged With: CDEGS, XGSLab

Electrical Earthing Training – Free Trial

Do you want to understand more about Electrical Earthing System Design – Greymatters Academy is our Earthing Training site take a look or access your free trial here.

Recent Posts:

How-to sessions in earthing design

If you’re an electrical engineer, you know how crucial it is to have a solid grounding system for your electrical installations. Proper earthing design protects against electrical shock, ensures electrical safety, and prolongs the lifespan of your equipment. But what happens when you encounter a complex grounding challenge that’s beyond your expertise? That’s where “how-to” […]

Ian getting ready

We take a look at soil resistivity and provide practical advice on what is ground soil resistivity, why we measure it and these common mistakes when Soil Resistivity Testing:

Soil Resistivity Testing Methods Wenner 4 Probe Test

Soil Resistivity Testing Methods a popular post. Originally published in 2013 and now updated. A Wenner probe test is a geotechnical investigation method used to determine the electrical resistivity of the soil. Soil resistivity testing can be carried out using different methods. The Wenner 4 Probe test is one of the most common soil resistivity […]

Schlumberger Array

The Schlumberger array is a geotechnical investigation method which determines the electrical resistivity of the soil. This is similar to the Wenner probe test, but it uses multiple current electrodes rather than just two. This allows for a more detailed and accurate measurement of soil resistivity. Soil resistivity testing carried out using different methods, this […]

Driven Rod Method

The driven rod test is a geotechnical investigation method which determines the resistance of soil to the penetration of a rod or other penetrometer.  The Soil resistivity is determined using different Soil Resistivity Testing methods. However the Driven Rod, described below is the last of the three most popular Soil Resistivity Testing methods we use […]

About Hugh

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

GreyMatters Accreditations

GreyMatters Accreditations

Online Earthing Courses

Free Trial Learn More

Free Online Course – Learn Ohms Law in 10 minutes or less!

Learn Ohms Law

Blog Categories

  • Acadamy (3)
  • Anti-Theft (1)
  • CDEGS (6)
  • Earth Testing (6)
  • Earthing Designs (7)
  • Earthing System Design (16)
  • Earthing Systems (5)
  • Electrical Earthing (39)
  • Energy Modelling Software (1)
  • General Post (11)
  • Grounding (1)
  • Lightning (11)
  • Lightning Protection Design (17)
  • Lightning Strike (1)
  • Renewable Energy (2)
  • Soil Resistivity (18)
  • Soil Resistivity Testing (10)
  • Solar (5)
  • XGSLab Updates (3)

Tag Cloud

BS7430 BS EN 50522 CDEGS data centres earth electrode Earthing earthing design earthing protection earthing standards Earthing system design earthing systems earth potential rise earth systems Electrical Earthing System Design Electromagnetic Field Theory electromagnetic interference EMI EN 50522 EPR Finite Element Analysis Finite Element Analysis Software greymatters Grounding HV Earthing HV Earthing Protection lightning lightning danger Lightning Protection lightning strikes Renewable Energy Rise of Earth Potential risk management ROEP Soil Resistivity Soil Resistivity Methods Soil Resistivity Testing Soil Resistivity Testing 10 Common Mistakes Soil Resistivity Testing Methods soil structure Step Potential Surge Protection Tag Archive - Lightning Strike Touch Potential what to do in a thunderstorm what to do when lightning strikes

Footer

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
GREYMATTERS PART OF THE GROUP OF COMPANIES © 2023