• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

GreyMatters

Electrical Earthing System Design & Soil Resistivity Testing

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Earthing Services
    • Earthing Design Services
    • Lightning Protection Design
  • Earthing Training Courses
  • XGSLab
    • XGSLab Services
    • XGSLab Online Demo
    • XGSLab Sales
  • Members Academy
Home » Ask the Experts Electrical Earthing Blog » Comparison between XGSLab and CDEGS

27/11/2019 By Hugh Leave a Comment

Comparison between XGSLab and CDEGS

In this blog, I’m going under to hood, so to speak. Comparing CDEGS with XGSLab to show you some real-world examples where CDEGS and XGSLab give almost identical results.

Therefore, in all of these examples, we have completed and verified the earthing design for these sites and found good agreement between the modelled results and the post-installation measurements. On this basis, we can say that XGSLab matches CDEGS for accuracy, and both tools have good agreement with the real-world measurements.

Comparing CDEGS with XGSLab

Comparing CDEGS with XGSLab – General Introduction

As a result, the 3 examples presented, we are comparing results from CDEGS HIFREQ against results from XGSA_FD. These are the high-end packages, offering the best agreement with the real world, particularly in low soil resistivity situations, such as those in example 2. So, for each example, we give an outline of the project, and then present the EPR at the point of fault. Together with, the EPR contour plot provided by each tool. 

And, for consistency, the same soil models are used for both tools, generated using CDEGS RESAP. A future blog will look at the comparison between CDEGS RESAP and XGS SRA (Soil Resistivity Analyser)

Example 1

This is a wind turbine project, located in the countryside near Cardigan in Wales. The Wind Turbine connects to the 11 kV distribution network via a wood pole line with a small package substation to the bottom left. A transformer located at the base of the turbine feeds a Farmhouse (not included in the model. A key requirement on this project was to keep the hot contours away from the Farmhouse and other 3rd parties.

Soil Model

Example 1 Soil Model

CDEGS HIFREQ

CDEQS HIFREQ Model Plan View
CDEQS HIFREQ Model Isometric View
CDEGS HIFRQ EPR - Conductors
CDEGS HIFRQ EPR - Soil Surface

Another note is that the first phase of the model, where CDEGS determines the current distribution (and therefore the voltages) in the conductors, takes 10 minutes to run on my PC. The second phase, where it determines the voltages at the soil service takes 15 minutes

XGSA_FD

XGSA_FD Model Layout
XGSA_FD EPR - Conductors

In the latest release, XGSA_FD takes 45 seconds to perform the first phase of modelling and 30 minutes to run the 2nd phase

XGSA_FD EPR - Soil Surface

Comparison

ItemCDEGS HIFREQ EPR (V)XGSA_FD EPR (V)Difference (%)
Value356035610.03

Example 2

This is a 33 kV substation that was constructed as the point of connection for 2 large scale solar farms near Bristol. 

Soil Model

CDEGS HIFREQ

XGSA_FD

Comparison

ItemCDEGS HIFREQ EPR (V)XGSA_FD EPR (V)Difference (%)
Value286.8287.60.27

Example 3

This is energy from a waste site located near London. There are 2 generators located on-site, each with a dedicated grid connection, with the point of connection on an isolated earth electrode. This model simulates an earth fault in the larger building.

Soil Model

CDEGS HIFREQ

XGSA_FD

Comparison

ItemCDEGS HIFREQ EPR (V)XGSA_FD EPR (V)Difference (%)
Value41.4241.400.06

Conclusions

In these example cases, we’ve shown that in all cases, XGSLab and CDEGS have an extremely good agreement. The team at SINT Ingegneria have produced papers showing that XGSLab produces results matching the standard examples in IEEE 80.

So the difference we found between XGSLab and CDEGS

ItemCDEGS HIFREQ EPR (V)XGSA_FD EPR (V)Difference (%)
Example 1356035610.03
Example 2286.8287.60.27
Example 341.4241.400.06

Comparing XGSLab and CDEGS, a key point of difference is in conductor segmentation. The default CDEGS segmentation can lead to poor accuracy, particularly in low resistivity soil structures like those in example 2. In comparison, XGSLab makes assigning segmentation for the whole model a 1 click process, and the default segmentation option leads to much better accuracy. Obviously, any increase in segmentation level is likely to lead to an increase in computation time. However, getting the accuracy right is more important, and in my experience, a few minutes increase in computation time is not as important as getting things right the first time. It is likely that the increased difference in example 2 can be put down to the difference in segmentation approaches

XGSLab UK Agents – GreyMatters

XGSLab Guarantee
We are so confident Comparing CDEGS to XGLab we offer this personal GUARANTEE!

Now we’ve shown that for comparable models XGSLab and CDEGS will give the same results. So, why not get in touch to request a demo and see for yourself how easy it is to use XGSLab.

Filed Under: Electrical Earthing Tagged With: CDEGS, XGSLab

Electrical Earthing Training – Free Trial

Do you want to understand more about Electrical Earthing System Design – Greymatters Academy is our Earthing Training site take a look or access your free trial here.

Recent Posts:

Why is a hot site a problem

Hugh takes us on a deeper dive into hot sites and answers the question ‘Why is a hot site a problem?’ You can find the webinar replay here. Hugh: Hello, everyone, thanks for joining our webinar this morning. This is a continuation from our previous session where Ian introduced the concept of a hot site […]

why am I getting a hot site?

Hello, and welcome this month’s topic, Ian answers the question Why am I getting a hot site? You can find the webinar replay here. Now for those that know me, I like to start these sessions with a thought of a concept that I’ve come across over the week. This is another one from James […]

Power Systems Design

Are you involved in Power Systems Design – You can now watch tens of hours of webinars in just a few minutes as I’ve summarized the top 3 ideas from over 17 technical webinars during the past 12-months.

Why is a hot site a problem

SPD (surge protection devices) are almost a prerequisite for every electrical and lightning protection system. Knowing when these devices are working or not can be a real pain. Usually, we’re forced to physically open up live panels to check if the plethora of SPDs is still functioning; very often, this task is made even more […]

why am I getting a hot site?

Testing an Earth/ground electrode is usually the final piece of the puzzle. Measuring the earth electrode’s resistance can verify and validate the design. The Earth measurement verifies that all the safety-critical calculations, assumptions and solutions made during the design phase match its predicted performance in the physical world. Earth testing can easily introduce errors that […]

About Hugh

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Take this short quiz

HV Earthing Quiz

Online Earthing Courses

Free Trial Learn More

Free Online Course – Learn Ohms Law in 10 minutes or less!

Learn Ohms Law

Our Top Earthing Post

Electrical Fault Theory

Blog Categories

  • Acadamy (2)
  • Anti-Theft (1)
  • CDEGS (5)
  • Earth Testing (6)
  • Earthing Designs (3)
  • Earthing System Design (16)
  • Earthing Systems (4)
  • Electrical Earthing (34)
  • General Post (9)
  • Lightning (7)
  • Lightning Protection Design (15)
  • Lightning Strike (1)
  • Renewable Energy (2)
  • Soil Resistivity (16)
  • Soil Resistivity Testing (10)
  • Solar (3)
  • XGSLab Updates (2)

Tag Cloud

BS7430 BS EN 50522 CDEGS data centres earth electrode Earthing Earthing Arrangements earthing design earthing standards Earthing system design earthing systems earth potential rise Electrical Earthing System Design Electromagnetic Field Theory electromagnetic interference EMI EN 50522 EPR Finite Element Analysis Finite Element Analysis Software greymatters Grounding HV Earthing HV Earthing Protection lightning lightning danger Lightning Protection lightning strikes Rise of Earth Potential risk management ROEP Soil Resistivity Soil Resistivity Methods Soil Resistivity Testing Soil Resistivity Testing 10 Common Mistakes Soil Resistivity Testing Methods soil structure Step Potential Step Voltage Surge Protection Tag Archive - Lightning Strike Touch Potential Touch Voltage what to do in a thunderstorm what to do when lightning strikes

Footer

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Cookies

Copyright GreyMatters © 2022