• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

GreyMatters

Electrical Earthing System Design & Soil Resistivity Testing

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Earthing Services
    • Earthing Design Services
    • Lightning Protection Design
  • Earthing Training Courses
  • XGSLab
    • XGSLab Services
    • XGSLab Online Demo
    • XGSLab Sales
  • Members Academy
Home » Ask the Experts Electrical Earthing Blog » Floating Roof Tank Earthing Strategies – Bypass conductors for lightning

12/09/2017 By Ian Leave a Comment

Floating Roof Tank Earthing Strategies – Bypass conductors for lightning

Floating Roof Tank Fires are Common

There are some 15 to 20 known Floating Roof Tank (FRT) fires per year. Floating Roof Tanks are especially vulnerable to the direct and indirect effects of lightning. Direct, or a nearby lightning strike can cause electrical current to flow across the tank shell and roof. When these lightning currents arc across the roof/shell interface, they can ignite any flammable vapours present with devastating effect.

Floating Roof Tank Earthing
Nearby strike

As an example, if the lightning strike hits an adjacent stack.  This strike can cause the charge in the tank walls to discharge rapidly.  The prolem of leaving a ‘bound charge’ suspended in the product itself. Hence, failing to earth or ground the tank robustly. Therefore this situation can create a secondary arc. Igniting the vapours!

This typical scenario highlights why lightning does NOT have to hit the tank itself to cause an explosion or fire. 

Reducing the Risk

Floating Roof Tank Earthing
Sparking shunts

Floating Roof Tank SHUNTS shown in the image above, used for many years as the default method to earth-out (ground) the roof to the tank wall.

Studies by the API (American Petroleum Institute) have shown these shunts often fail to provide the required contact between the roof and wall.  They are prone to wear issues as well as being sensitive to tank deformation. Without a properly earthed roof, the risk of FIRE is very high.

Floating Roof Tank Fire
Floating Roof Tank Fire

So, knowing shunts are not the complete answer for Floating Roof Tanks; especially for the larger tanks. Competent engineers will install secondary bypass conductors to close-out the risk of the shunts not performing to prevent arcing at the roof/shell interface.  But it doesn’t stop there!

What else do you need to consider?

Floating Roof Tank Earthing
10-350 lightning waveform – BS EN 62305

Lightning has a complex personality.  It is made up of multiple frequencies from DC to Megahertz (MHz). Thus, the lightning current can, in turn, exhibit many behaviours or responses, unlike a single power frequency related fault. The average energy released in a single lightning flash to the ground is 55 kWh. A significant amount of energy by modern generation standards.

According to IEC 62305, Lightning current magnitudes for a Class I, lightning protection level (LPL) consider and design to withstand 200 kA.  A feature of lightning currents is the fact that most of this energy expends in only 100 to 300 microseconds and
 that the lightning reaches peak current in a matter of microseconds, i.e. it manifests in the form of a ‘pulse’ (discharge).

What does this mean for the Floating Roof Tank?

Substantially reducing the risk of sustained arcs for the Floating Roof Tank requires a reliable, full-time, low impedance and low-resistance connection between the tank shell and roof.  The low impedance is desirable due to the higher frequency components of a lightning strike.  The low resistance is necessary to ‘mop-up’ the lower frequencies efficiently until the discharge process (current flow) has finished.  All this, regardless of the tank shell’s condition and geometry.

Option 1

One option is to rely on the tank shunts as the only protection measure.  But as mentioned earlier, this carries a significant risk of failure when you most need it.  Large tanks deform during high winds, i.e. in storms! Compromising how the shunts perform.  Over time, the shunts themselves take on deformation and effectively get stuck into positions that are not in contact with the shell.  For every shunt not in connection with the tank, shell equates to an increase of arcing and overloading the remaining shunts.  No prizes for what can happen next!

Option 2

Supplement the shunts with a conventional direct cable connection from the shell wall to the roof. Although not an elegant, it does add a layer of mitigation by providing a low resistance connection, at least.  The downside is the risk of cable-snagging and getting cut without anyone noticing until it’s too late.  Inspections of live tanks at high-level usually require special breathing equipment and pre-planning as part of scheduled maintenance.  Therefore, seeing a severed cable may take many months.

Also, the cable is fixed length, therefore, fixed impedance regardless of roof position.  This impedance can be quite high if not carefully considered.  The low impedance bond is particularly important if the tank suffers a direct strike discharging the energy more locally, and at the higher frequency component of lightning plays a more significant role.

Option 3

Option three adds another layer on from the previous options by connecting the wall-roof directly with a low-resistance-low-impedance conductor.  In real-life, these retractable conductors are distributed around the tank perimeter shell at equidistant spacings to share the lightning current load evenly.

Floating roof tank earthing
Floating Roof Tank bypass conductor RGA

Bypass conductors compliant to API RP 545 are an incredibly simple way of achieving a robust electrically continuous path between the floating roof and tank wall 100% of the time.  This continuos path keeps both the wall and roof at the same potential, without the risk of severing a cable or any shunts failing.

This option gives you the peace of mind that the contents of your tank will not ignite due to lightning-induced issues.  Although it has to be noted that the correct installation of the Bypass conductors is critical, get this bit wrong, and any benefit from the retractable conductors evaporates – so it is advisable to get the units installed (preloaded) correctly from the outset by a competent ‘trained’ engineering team.

If you are at the point of reconsidering your existing shunt system Why not email us so we can discuss the next steps.

Oil Tank Explosion Highlights Need for Retractable Grounding Assembly

On September 17th 2014 the essential need for a retractable grounding assembly (RGA) was revealed. Because 1,400 barrels of oil exploded due to a devastating lightning strike.

The incident occurred in Baytown, America at 1 pm in the afternoon. Also, the sheer destruction of the lightning was only realised after the fire brigade fought the flames for a total of 45 minutes.

retractable grounding assembly
Avoidable with retractable grounding assembly?

Devastation

Two entire tanks were completely destroyed as well as three other tanks that contained brine water.

Baytown Oil Tank on Fire
Baytown oil tank on fire
Source: http://abc13.com/news/baytown-fd-lightning-strikes-oil-tank-causing-big-explosion/312773/

Was it avoidable?

Investigations are still continuing.  Lightning is a ‘competitive event’, that is to say, a strike will attach to the item offering the most attractive path for the energy to transfer.  Some say it’s impossible to predict where or when lightning will strike.  But there are some fundamental indicators whether a structure has the necessary ingredients and there are some things we can all do to either prevent a strike or deal with the aftermath of one safely.

Solution Retractable Grounding Assembly

So, the retractable ground assembly (RGA) is an incredibly simple way of achieving a robust electrically continuous path between the floating roof and tank wall 100% of the time.  This keeps both the wall and the roof at the same potential hence giving you the peace of mind that the contents of your tanks will not ignite due to lightning-induced issues!

Here come the Retractable Grounding Assembly (RGA) sales bit.

The ATEX certified and API approved RGA has a proven track record of mitigating lightning-related tank fires.  It also reduces the risk of sparking as a result of poor maintenance, contamination build-up, corrosion, as well as shunt deformation and has a full 5-year warranty as standard!

End of sales bit.

Find full details regarding “by-pass” conductors in document API RP 545, First Edition (product code C54501).

Myths of By-Pass Conductors, Busted webinar replay – We look at the risk associated with ATEX/COMAH sites and what the ATEX-approved patented Retractable Grounding Assembly (RGA) do to reduce the risk of tank fires by subduing sustained arcs during the lightning event and other electrical phenomena.

What’s Next

GreyMatters provides Retractable Grounding Assembly (RGA) solutions as well as Earthing solutions to all critical assets.  however, you can find out more about the RGA here, or why not see if your assets are at risk by taking our free ‘no-strings’ quick risk audit.  

Engage with us…

  • Earthing Design Services & Lightning Protection Design – If high voltage power systems and lightning are causing you concern why not see how we can help with a quick ‘live chat’ below as a start.
  • XGSLab – A complete software tool for the simulation of  Power, Earthing, Grounding and Lightning Systems, get in touch to request a free demo.
  • Get Certified – Start your journey to become certified in Power Systems Earthing & Design.
  • E-Learning – Introduction to Earthing, get a free trial here.
  • Get answers quickly using the searchable Technical Blog section.

Filed Under: Lightning Protection Design Tagged With: earthing design, Electrical Earthing System Design, Lightning Protection

Electrical Earthing Training – Free Trial

Do you want to understand more about Electrical Earthing System Design – Greymatters Academy is our Earthing Training site take a look or access your free trial here.

Recent Posts:

Ian getting ready

We take a look at soil resistivity and provide practical advice on what is ground soil resistivity, why we measure it and these common mistakes when Soil Resistivity Testing:

Soil Resistivity Testing Methods Wenner 4 Probe Test

Soil Resistivity Testing Methods a popular post. Originally published in 2013 and now updated. A Wenner probe test is a geotechnical investigation method used to determine the electrical resistivity of the soil. Soil resistivity testing can be carried out using different methods. The Wenner 4 Probe test is one of the most common soil resistivity […]

Schlumberger Array

The Schlumberger array is a geotechnical investigation method which determines the electrical resistivity of the soil. This is similar to the Wenner probe test, but it uses multiple current electrodes rather than just two. This allows for a more detailed and accurate measurement of soil resistivity. Soil resistivity testing carried out using different methods, this […]

Driven Rod Method

The driven rod test is a geotechnical investigation method which determines the resistance of soil to the penetration of a rod or other penetrometer.  The Soil resistivity is determined using different Soil Resistivity Testing methods. However the Driven Rod, described below is the last of the three most popular Soil Resistivity Testing methods we use […]

2022 webinar - the highlights

Knowing in today’s world it’s all about time. We’ve summarise hours of technical content into this 20-minute bite-sized session, including the key highlights from the 2022 webinar series. If you missed it, watch the webinar replay here. In this webinar we cover:

About Ian

This post is written by Ian Griffiths, Principal Engineer at GreyMatters, an Earthing & Lightning Consultant of 28 years, one of the top 1% accredited CDEGS and XGSLab consultants and professional advisor to international utility companies, data centre and infrastructure developers.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

GreyMatters Accreditations

GreyMatters Accreditations

Online Earthing Courses

Free Trial Learn More

Free Online Course – Learn Ohms Law in 10 minutes or less!

Learn Ohms Law

Blog Categories

  • Acadamy (2)
  • Anti-Theft (1)
  • CDEGS (6)
  • Earth Testing (6)
  • Earthing Designs (7)
  • Earthing System Design (16)
  • Earthing Systems (5)
  • Electrical Earthing (38)
  • Energy Modelling Software (1)
  • General Post (10)
  • Grounding (1)
  • Lightning (11)
  • Lightning Protection Design (16)
  • Lightning Strike (1)
  • Renewable Energy (2)
  • Soil Resistivity (18)
  • Soil Resistivity Testing (10)
  • Solar (4)
  • XGSLab Updates (3)

Tag Cloud

BS7430 BS EN 50522 CDEGS data centres earth electrode Earthing earthing design earthing protection earthing standards Earthing system design earthing systems earth potential rise earth systems Electrical Earthing System Design Electromagnetic Field Theory electromagnetic interference EMI EN 50522 EPR Finite Element Analysis Finite Element Analysis Software greymatters Grounding HV Earthing HV Earthing Protection lightning lightning danger Lightning Protection lightning strikes Renewable Energy Rise of Earth Potential risk management ROEP Soil Resistivity Soil Resistivity Methods Soil Resistivity Testing Soil Resistivity Testing 10 Common Mistakes Soil Resistivity Testing Methods soil structure Step Potential Surge Protection Tag Archive - Lightning Strike Touch Potential what to do in a thunderstorm what to do when lightning strikes

Footer

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
GREYMATTERS PART OF THE GROUP OF COMPANIES © 2023