• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

GreyMatters

Electrical Earthing System Design & Soil Resistivity Testing

  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Earthing Services
    • Earthing Design Services
    • Earth Monitoring System
    • Lightning Protection Design
    • Earthing Training Courses
  • Earthing Solutions
  • XGSLab
    • XGSLab Services
    • XGSLab Online Demo
    • XGSLab Sales
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Electrical Earthing / Earth Testing Procedures in Urban Environments

26/09/2019 By Ian Leave a Comment

Earth Testing Procedures in Urban Environments

Electrical earth testing can be a real challenge in built-up areas. Not only are there very few soft areas to deploy the test probes, but underground cabling and conductive structures are everywhere. These two factors massively affect the measured readings leading to measured values that bear no relation to the actual electrode tested.  Therefore, what follows is the Earth Testing Procedure Greymatters adopts.

Step 1

Follow the guidance in HSG47. The city or town’s infrastructure produces large amounts of in-ground noise and interference. Mitigation by reading buried service/cable records; observing signs of previous excavations; and use a cable avoidance tool (CAT) can make sense of where the structures are.

Earth Testing procedures Urban Environments

Buried conductive structures like cables and pipes provide a preferred route for the earth tester’s signal to travel along, instead of it passing through the surrounding geology. So, you end up measuring the effect of the cable, pipe or object. Not good!

Step 2

Find a workable traverse for the earth tester’s leads, which isn’t obstructed by something above ground and also escapes the electrical influence of the electrode under test. When you’ve done that you can deploy the leads per the chosen method, for example, fall-of-potential, intersecting curves or slope test.

Lead deployment distances for the fall-of-potential methods need to escape the electrical influence of the electrode under test. Therefore, the lead deployment distances can be quite vast. In theory, up to 6-10 times the longest dimension of the electrode under test. In some cases, this is not practical; then a distance of no less than 2.5-times should be used. Therefore, if the electrode under test has a longest dimension of 50m, then one requires the current probe to be some 300+m out from the electrode, ideally.

For some densely populated urban environments, this is not practical, but we touch on what you can do if this happens further into this article.

Step 3

Protect your leads! Some of the more curious passers-by like nothing more than to see you struggle for a laugh by messing with your test leads when you’ve turned your back. If on a construction site, your friendly 6-28 tonne dumper driver will obligingly drive his load over your delicate leads in a heartbeat and watches your tears fall. Yes, this really can and does happen, so be warned. 😉

Step 4

Up to this point, the previous 3-steps have been about preparation and avoiding the introduction of errors into your measurements. Step 4 is about the execution of the earth test itself, which we cover in our online training courses. 

Step 5

Once all the measurements are taken; it often best practice to validate the readings before recovering your leads and heading to the next test location. Why? Most testers simple record a reading. They do not interpret or hint to a possible error in the data you’ve just spent a long time acquiring. So it’s good practice to do a rough sense-check for data integrity before leaving the location.

As one of my metalworking teachers used to say at college; “…measure twice, cut once!”

Returning to the site because the measurements were junk is no fun at all and costly. So, run some quick checks before leaving site means you can adapt a lead-deployment and tune out potential errors; or remedy a duff reading in minutes.

Step 6

For the space-constrained earth tests. The final step is to post-process the data; build a model of the electrode, the soil, and the test equipment and simulate the physical earth tests carried out. This includes matching the lead deployments and distances.

The computations from the physical-to-virtual earth tests should show a good agreement between the two domains. Once in agreement, one can extrapolate the lead deployments in the “virtual-world” much further than is possible in the physical world. Thus, enabling the more ideal probe distances of x6 to x10-times the electrode to properly escape the electrical influence mentioned in step 2. 

So, to summarise Step 6. The software model is calibrated to the physical measurements. Then because the software model is not constrained by physical obstacles; the model can extrapolate the lead distances to whatever distance is required in order to exceed the electrical influence of the electrode. This approach fixes the limitations of earth testing procedures in built-up areas and ensures reliable, validated earth tests that keep people and your reputation safe!

Important Note

IEC EN 50522 states:

“8 Measurements

Measurements shall be carried out after construction, where necessary, to verify the adequacy of the design.

9.2 Measurements

Design and installation of the earthing system shall allow measurements to be carried out periodically. Or following major changes affecting fundamental requirements, or even for continuity tests.”

Greymatter’s has expertise in a wide variety of Electrical Earthing System Services use the chat window below or, Contact Us here.

Filed Under: Electrical Earthing Tagged With: Earth Testing, EN 50522, Remote Finite Element Analysis Earth Testing

Electrical Earthing Training – Free Trial

Do you want to understand more about Electrical Earthing System Design – Greymatters Academy is our Earthing Training site take a look or access your free trial here.

Recent Posts:

Are you feeling overwhelmed or out of your depth, well stop. Test drive our new online Training for Earthing courses. And say goodbye to PowerPoint slides forever! I don’t care how many tips and fixes there are out there on the info-web that claim to make boring training for earthing PowerPoint (PPT) slides less boring… […]

Comparing CDEGS with XGSLab

In his previous blog, Ian explained our decision to work with XGSLab, on the basis that it is an equally capable tool as CDEGS, that is much easier to use. In this blog, I’m going under to hood, so to speak. Comparing CDEGS with XGSLab to show you some real-world examples where CDEGS and XGSLab […]

XGSLab Electromagnetic Simulation Software

Since 2016, Greymatters prime purpose is to protect life. More personally, my goal is explicitly to save at least one life before I head off to the pearly gates and return into space dust. Knowing we’re focused on saving lives through the work we do. It makes sense that everything we do supports this goal, […]

Soil Resistivity Testing

Ground testing is typically performed in two stages. The first is conducted during the construction of a building to ensure proper installation of the electrical system. And the second involves routine ground testing to ensure the ‘actual’ arrangements perform as ‘predicted’ at the design stage. Thus, to avoid costly and fatal errors. What is the […]

Electrical earth testing can be a real challenge in built-up areas. Not only are there very few soft areas to deploy the test probes, but underground cabling and conductive structures are everywhere. These two factors massively affect the measured readings leading to measured values that bear no relation to the actual electrode tested.  Therefore, what […]

Earthing System Design A Probabilistic Approach

What are the procedures for creating an HV Earthing System Design? Also, how might these differ from an LV Earth design? Firstly, although the principles underpinning HV and LV earthing are similar, the approaches are very different. Probabilistic Approach The first huge difference is the recognition that HV electrical earthing design is probabilistic in nature. […]

About Ian

This post is written by Ian Griffiths, Principal Engineer at GreyMatters, an Earthing & Lightning Consultant of 27 years, one of the top 1% accredited CDEGS consultants and professional advisor to international utility companies, data centre and infrastructure developers.

Reader Interactions

You must log in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Online Earthing Courses

Dominate Your Sector with
The GreyMatters Academy

Free Trial Learn More

Our Top Earthing Post

Electrical Fault Theory

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog Categories

  • Acadamy (2)
  • Anti-Theft (2)
  • Carbon Footprint (2)
  • CDEGS (5)
  • Earth Testing (5)
  • Earthing System Design (15)
  • Earthing Systems (7)
  • Eco (8)
  • Electrical Earthing (34)
  • General Post (44)
  • Lightning (10)
  • Lightning Protection Design (15)
  • Lightning Strike (3)
  • Newsletters (4)
  • Renewable Energy (7)
  • Soil Resistivity (16)
  • Soil Resistivity Testing (10)
  • Solar (8)
  • Wind (2)

Tag Cloud

BS7430 BS EN 50522 CDEGS copper theft data centres Earthing earthing design earthing standards Earthing system design earthing systems earth potential rise Eco Electrical Earthing System Design Electromagnetic Field Theory electromagnetic interference EMI EN 50522 Energy EPR Finite Element Analysis Finite Element Analysis Software gm people greymatters Grounding Helpful Tips In the Media lightning lightning danger Lightning Protection lightning strikes News newsletter Renewables Rise of Earth Potential ROEP Soil Resistivity Soil Resistivity Testing Soil Resistivity Testing 10 Common Mistakes Soil Resistivity Testing Methods soil structure solar south africa Tag Archive - Lightning Strike Videos what to do in a thunderstorm

Footer

Contact GreyMatters

Bristol and Bath Science Park
Dirac Crescent
Emersons Green
Bristol
BS16 7FR
+44 (0) 117 247 0050
hello@greymattersglobal.com
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Cookies

Copyright GreyMatters © 2019

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Read more.